Physical Phenomena as Interpreted in Recent Times - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:49:41Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|physical phenomena interpreted recent times]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|physical phenomena interpreted recent times]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|physical phenomena interpreted recent times]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:53:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	A change in the outlook of physicists and in the associated physical theory began, rather gradually, as the end of last century approached. This had its origin in the unsuccessful efforts of the natural philosophers of that time to account satisfactorily for certain well-authenticated phenomena in terms of the accepted physical theory, which of course was based on Sir Isaac Newton's mechanical principles. One formidable problem emerged from. the fact that the interpretation of stellar aberration, on the one hand, and of the result of the experiments of Michelson and Morley (1887) on the other, led to conflicting conclusions about the motion of the luminiferous medium. relatively to the earth. Another, different, problem was that presented by the experimentally determined distribution of energy in the normal spectrum. (spectrum of black body radiation).[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		A change in the outlook of physicists and in the associated physical theory began, rather gradually, as the end of last century approached. This had its origin in the unsuccessful efforts of the natural philosophers of that time to account satisfactorily for certain well-authenticated phenomena in terms of the accepted physical theory, which of course was based on Sir Isaac Newton's mechanical principles. One formidable problem emerged from. the fact that the interpretation of stellar aberration, on the one hand, and of the result of the experiments of Michelson and Morley (1887) on the other, led to conflicting conclusions about the motion of the luminiferous medium. relatively to the earth. Another, different, problem was that presented by the experimentally determined distribution of energy in the normal spectrum. (spectrum of black body radiation).

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|physical phenomena interpreted recent times]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T18:47:58Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Physical Phenomena as Interpreted in Recent Times
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6389.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[William Wilson]]
| published = 1952
| journal = [[Science Progress]]
| volume = [[40]]
| num_pages = 10
| pages = 625-634
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6389.pdf here]

==Abstract==

A change in the outlook of physicists and in the associated physical theory began, rather gradually, as the end of last century approached. This had its origin in the unsuccessful efforts of the natural philosophers of that time to account satisfactorily for certain well-authenticated phenomena in terms of the accepted physical theory, which of course was based on Sir Isaac Newton's mechanical principles. One formidable problem emerged from. the fact that the interpretation of stellar aberration, on the one hand, and of the result of the experiments of Michelson and Morley (1887) on the other, led to conflicting conclusions about the motion of the luminiferous medium. relatively to the earth. Another, different, problem was that presented by the experimentally determined distribution of energy in the normal spectrum. (spectrum of black body radiation).[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]