Particles vs Waves: Finite Topological Thermodynamics - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:49:15Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|particles vs waves finite topological thermodynamics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|particles vs waves finite topological thermodynamics]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity\|particles vs waves finite topological thermodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:52:49Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Traditional physical theories have been constrained historically by assumptions of "geo-metrical" di?eomorphisms, invariant symmetries, and topological invariance. These ideas are useful to the understanding of equilibrium thermodynamic states, and processes that lead to time reversibility of equilibrium topological systems, and the conservation of energy. However, the geometrical constraints o?er no insight into non-equilibrium thermodynamic systems and irreversible processes, such as observed in the biological environment. Geometrical tensor methods are inadequate and must be replaced by topological thinking. Emphasis must be placed upon methods that describe continuous topological evolution, and not topological invariance. For example, to form a categorical marriage between gravity and quantum mechanics requires the recognition that the topological structure of "particles" is di?erent from the topological structure of "waves".[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Traditional physical theories have been constrained historically by assumptions of "geo-metrical" di?eomorphisms, invariant symmetries, and topological invariance. These ideas are useful to the understanding of equilibrium thermodynamic states, and processes that lead to time reversibility of equilibrium topological systems, and the conservation of energy. However, the geometrical constraints o?er no insight into non-equilibrium thermodynamic systems and irreversible processes, such as observed in the biological environment. Geometrical tensor methods are inadequate and must be replaced by topological thinking. Emphasis must be placed upon methods that describe continuous topological evolution, and not topological invariance. For example, to form a categorical marriage between gravity and quantum mechanics requires the recognition that the topological structure of "particles" is di?erent from the topological structure of "waves".

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|particles vs waves finite topological thermodynamics]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T16:41:07Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Particles vs Waves: Finite Topological Thermodynamics
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6820.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Robert M Kiehn]]
| published = 2012
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 22
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6820.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Traditional physical theories have been constrained historically by assumptions of "geo-metrical" di?eomorphisms, invariant symmetries, and topological invariance. These ideas are useful to the understanding of equilibrium thermodynamic states, and processes that lead to time reversibility of equilibrium topological systems, and the conservation of energy. However, the geometrical constraints o?er no insight into non-equilibrium thermodynamic systems and irreversible processes, such as observed in the biological environment. Geometrical tensor methods are inadequate and must be replaced by topological thinking. Emphasis must be placed upon methods that describe continuous topological evolution, and not topological invariance. For example, to form a categorical marriage between gravity and quantum mechanics requires the recognition that the topological structure of "particles" is di?erent from the topological structure of "waves".[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Gravity]]