On Lorentz Transformation - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:46:38Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|lorentz transformation]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|lorentz transformation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|lorentz transformation]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:48:26Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|lorentz transformation]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:02:09Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = On Lorentz Transformation
| author = [[Diego Jos? Arturo Sa]]
| keywords = [[Lorentz Transformation]], [[Speical Relativity]], [[infinitesimals]]
| published = 2005
| journal = [[None]]
}}

==Abstract==

The invalidity of the finite Lorentz transformation is suggested. A frequent error, preserved since the original works of Lorentz, Minkowski and Einstein, is that the Lorentz transformations are written as if they referred to finite magnitudes, when in fact they should refer to infinitesimals. To this error can be traced most of the paradoxes that pervade Special Relativity.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]