<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mr_Higgs_Doesn%27t_Reside_There</id>
	<title>Mr Higgs Doesn&#039;t Reside There - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mr_Higgs_Doesn%27t_Reside_There"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mr_Higgs_Doesn%27t_Reside_There&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-25T01:24:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mr_Higgs_Doesn%27t_Reside_There&amp;diff=1065&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Maintenance script: Imported from text file</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://naturalphilosophy.org/wiki/index.php?title=Mr_Higgs_Doesn%27t_Reside_There&amp;diff=1065&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-12-30T01:26:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Imported from text file&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox paper&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Mr. Higgs Doesn\&amp;#039;t Reside There &lt;br /&gt;
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5236.pdf Link to paper]&lt;br /&gt;
| author = [[Milos Abadzic]]&lt;br /&gt;
| published = 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]&lt;br /&gt;
| volume = [[7]]&lt;br /&gt;
| num_pages = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| pages = 1-2&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Read the full paper&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5236.pdf here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to all the significant success achieved in the last one hundred years or more, there is  the impression of a large number of physicists that physics as a science, has arrived at a certain  saturation, or that it has come to some kind of blind alley. Instead of progress in science  reducing the number of unsolved issues, we are faced within increase in this number. Trying to  overcome the difficulties, we introduce a variety of paradoxes, dualism or magnitudes without  any natural basis. All this was not enough even for an illusory solution some newly found  problems. Currently we expect from research in LHC (and as we hope ourselves), to find  the Higgs particle, to which already are attributed a number of desired characteristics, which  would enable us to resolve some of these issues. Wishes are nice but the question is whether or  not they are realistic. I doubt the reality and think with part of our research we are pushing on  the wrong side. No doubt we&amp;#039;ll get some data for new particles from this research, but this will  only be an increased of particles&amp;#039; debris created by decomposition. We may attribute to some of  them, the desired properties and get magnitudes like the photon with currently unknown  properties. I think that research requires some new approaches, not only for an increase in the  energy resolution of our testing and measuring devices. This does not mean to belittle their  importance but the question is whether the train leads to the desired goal - in this case, a deeper  knowledge of Nature.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Maintenance script</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>