Milne's Kinematic Relativity - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:43:00Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 1 January 2017
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|milne 's kinematic relativity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|milne 's kinematic relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|milne 's kinematic relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:42:25Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:42, 1 January 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:
	# A Program for Synthesis		# A Program for Synthesis

	In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|milne 's kinematic relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:27:35Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Milne\'s Kinematic Relativity
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_4470.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Mogens True Wegener]]
| keywords = [[Cosmology]]
| published = 2000
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 19
| pages = 255-274
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_4470.pdf here]

==Abstract==

''Revised version.'' # Cosmology, a Science?
# Milne's 'Kinematic' Relativity
# Walker's Analysis of Milne's Ideas
# Revolt Against Prejudice in Science!
# Theories of Continued Creation
# A Program for Synthesis

In our time, Cosmology is generally acknowledged to be the science of the universe. But what is the universe? Is it being, entity, or substance? Is it nature itself, ultimate reality? How do we overcome the desperate difficulties of speaking sensibly of everything at once? And in what sense can such an elusive subject be the object of anything like a real science? Can we avoid the danger of assuming either too little or too much even before we begin? Finally, the universe is one, or unique: how can it then give rise to a legitimate science at all such questions cry for their rational answers ... Hoping for better progress later, we shall start by making our language a bit more precise.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]