Microphysics Needs an Invariant Electrodynamics - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:42:55Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Electrodynamics\|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:42:14Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:42, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	A first-order Galilean-invariant covering theory of Maxwell?s equations of vacuum electromagnetism, first proposed by Heinrich Hertz, is reappraised in modern context. Physically, when properly formulated and interpreted for electromagnetic description, Hertz? theory is found to be both necessary, and ? insofar as the empirical facts are presently known ? sufficient. Mathematically, its use of the total time derivative instead of the Maxwellian partial time derivative is shown to be logically necessary under broadly applicable conditions. The physical superiority of the Hertzian formulation in the weak-field limit is emphasized.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		A first-order Galilean-invariant covering theory of Maxwell?s equations of vacuum electromagnetism, first proposed by Heinrich Hertz, is reappraised in modern context. Physically, when properly formulated and interpreted for electromagnetic description, Hertz? theory is found to be both necessary, and ? insofar as the empirical facts are presently known ? sufficient. Mathematically, its use of the total time derivative instead of the Maxwellian partial time derivative is shown to be logically necessary under broadly applicable conditions. The physical superiority of the Hertzian formulation in the weak-field limit is emphasized.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|microphysics needs invariant electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:01:40Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Microphysics Needs an Invariant Electrodynamics
| author = [[Thomas E Phipps]], [[Harold W Milnes]]
| published = 2002
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[13]]
| number = [[4]]
| pages = 63-70
}}

==Abstract==

A first-order Galilean-invariant covering theory of Maxwell?s equations of vacuum electromagnetism, first proposed by Heinrich Hertz, is reappraised in modern context. Physically, when properly formulated and interpreted for electromagnetic description, Hertz? theory is found to be both necessary, and ? insofar as the empirical facts are presently known ? sufficient. Mathematically, its use of the total time derivative instead of the Maxwellian partial time derivative is shown to be logically necessary under broadly applicable conditions. The physical superiority of the Hertzian formulation in the weak-field limit is emphasized.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Electrodynamics]]