Gyroscopic Paradox of Motion, Part II - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:36:31Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:36, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|gyroscopic paradox motion ii]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|gyroscopic paradox motion ii]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|gyroscopic paradox motion ii]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:30:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The cause of the several conundrums and paradoxes involving gyroscopic and centrifugal forces which were introduced in Part I are examined n greater detail in Part II. The merits of Newtonian Absolute Space are weighed against those of Machian Relative Space. Modification of a simple rotational device presents a more complex analytical challenge: its calculated conformance with local angular momentum conservation depends upon a basic assumption regarding the precise quantification of gyroscopic torque. Postulation of Machian interaction of the local system with distant matter to account for centrifugal and gyroscopic forces would require radical reassignment of components of the inertia tensor; any local discrepancy in angular momentum conservation would strongly indicate such interaction. An ?existence theorem' for this contingency is framed and examined, though it remains decidedly unproven. Another calculative paradox is introduced in this context. A hypothetical experimental procedure is described to settle the issue.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The cause of the several conundrums and paradoxes involving gyroscopic and centrifugal forces which were introduced in Part I are examined n greater detail in Part II. The merits of Newtonian Absolute Space are weighed against those of Machian Relative Space. Modification of a simple rotational device presents a more complex analytical challenge: its calculated conformance with local angular momentum conservation depends upon a basic assumption regarding the precise quantification of gyroscopic torque. Postulation of Machian interaction of the local system with distant matter to account for centrifugal and gyroscopic forces would require radical reassignment of components of the inertia tensor; any local discrepancy in angular momentum conservation would strongly indicate such interaction. An ?existence theorem' for this contingency is framed and examined, though it remains decidedly unproven. Another calculative paradox is introduced in this context. A hypothetical experimental procedure is described to settle the issue.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|gyroscopic paradox motion ii]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:19:21Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Gyroscopic Paradox of Motion, Part II
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6491.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Stewart Ian Wells]]
| published = 2012
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[9]]
| num_pages = 3
| pages = 652-654
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6491.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The cause of the several conundrums and paradoxes involving gyroscopic and centrifugal forces which were introduced in Part I are examined n greater detail in Part II. The merits of Newtonian Absolute Space are weighed against those of Machian Relative Space. Modification of a simple rotational device presents a more complex analytical challenge: its calculated conformance with local angular momentum conservation depends upon a basic assumption regarding the precise quantification of gyroscopic torque. Postulation of Machian interaction of the local system with distant matter to account for centrifugal and gyroscopic forces would require radical reassignment of components of the inertia tensor; any local discrepancy in angular momentum conservation would strongly indicate such interaction. An ?existence theorem' for this contingency is framed and examined, though it remains decidedly unproven. Another calculative paradox is introduced in this context. A hypothetical experimental procedure is described to settle the issue.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]