Greg Volk - Revision history

DeHilster at 00:19, 25 March 2017

2017-03-25T00:19:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 24 March 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:
	My decision not to pursue physics as a career was based in part on the uneasiness I felt regarding the fundamental laws. My gut told me that in coming closer to the core of things, greater and greater elegance, not messiness, ought to prevail. God's laws ought to be based on a few unifying concepts, not on ad hoc formulas. But the reverse seemed to be the case. I was deeply troubled by the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty, and felt something must be amiss. Nonetheless for years on my own time I dabbled with some of my own ideas about the foundations of creation.		My decision not to pursue physics as a career was based in part on the uneasiness I felt regarding the fundamental laws. My gut told me that in coming closer to the core of things, greater and greater elegance, not messiness, ought to prevail. God's laws ought to be based on a few unifying concepts, not on ad hoc formulas. But the reverse seemed to be the case. I was deeply troubled by the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty, and felt something must be amiss. Nonetheless for years on my own time I dabbled with some of my own ideas about the foundations of creation.

	In the summer of 2007 [[Russ McGlenn]] directed me to the work of [[David Bergman]] and Dr. [[Charles William Lucas]] of [[Common Sense Science]]. This awakened Greg's passion for physics at a time in my life when I was could devote some attention to serious study. Since then I have read everything I could find relating to Bergman's ring model and the classical foundations of physics (Prof. [[Andre ~~K. T.~~ Assis]], Dr. [[Petr Beckmann]], Dr. [[Peter Granea]], Dr. [[Thomas E Phipps]] Jr.], Dr. [[Paul Wesley]], Dr. Parry H. Moon, Dr. [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], etc.), as well as the original works of the masters (Newton, Huygens, Faraday, Boltzmann, Mach, Planck, and of course [[Albert Einstein]]). Greg firmly supports the [[Common Sense Science]] approach holds the key to solving many fundamental mysteries in physics, but one piece missing from the puzzle is the connection of entropy with electrodynamics, on which he is currently working.		In the summer of 2007 [[Russ McGlenn]] directed me to the work of [[David Bergman]] and Dr. [[Charles William Lucas]] of [[Common Sense Science]]. This awakened Greg's passion for physics at a time in my life when I was could devote some attention to serious study. Since then I have read everything I could find relating to Bergman's ring model and the classical foundations of physics (Prof. [[Andre Assis]], Dr. [[Petr Beckmann]], Dr. [[Peter Granea]], Dr. [[Thomas E Phipps]] Jr.], Dr. [[Paul Wesley]], Dr. Parry H. Moon, Dr. [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], etc.), as well as the original works of the masters (Newton, Huygens, Faraday, Boltzmann, Mach, Planck, and of course [[Albert Einstein]]). Greg firmly supports the [[Common Sense Science]] approach holds the key to solving many fundamental mysteries in physics, but one piece missing from the puzzle is the connection of entropy with electrodynamics, on which he is currently working.

			==Recent Work==

	In 2013, Greg became president of the [[NPA]] and is currently the vice-president of the [[CNPS]].		In 2013, Greg became president of the [[NPA]] and is currently the vice-president of the [[CNPS]].

DeHilster at 00:19, 25 March 2017

2017-03-25T00:19:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 24 March 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	}}		}}

	~~I attended Stanford from 1979 to 1984 as~~ an electrical engineer and~~ also took~~ the ~~entire core undergraduate curriculum in physics. I did not complete my masters in signal processing~~, ~~but did work~~ in~~ optical character recognition (OCR) ~~and~~ CAD conversion~~. ~~An entrepreneur at heart, I chose not to go into physics or engineering as a career, but have been a stock broker~~ and ~~investor, real estate broker, mortgage broker, landlord, music arranger, composer, business owner,~~ and ~~oil man. Though my formal education ended in 1984, my real education began about that time, with interests ranging from classical literature, money~~ and ~~banking (yes, conspiracy theories, etc.), Bible study, children's books, to, of course, physics. My introduction to~~ Creation Science ~~in the late 1980s transformed my worldview from one of openness to any and all ideas, religious or otherwise, to one convinced of the existence of absolutes~~.		Greg Volk is an electrical engineer, entrepreneur, and American scientist who has worked outside the mainstream on scientific theory, specifically in the area of Maxwell's equation and scientific assumptions. He is also heavily involved in structures and geometry and has been greatly influenced by [[Common Sense Science]] and [[Creation Science]].

			==Education==
			Greg Volk attended Stanford from 1979 to 1984 as an electrical engineer and also took the entire core undergraduate curriculum in physics. Although he didn't finish his masters degree in signal processing, he did work in optical character recognition (OCR) and CAD conversion.

			==Professional Career==
			An entrepreneur at heart, Greg chose not to go into physics or engineering as a career, but have been a stock broker and investor, real estate broker, mortgage broker, landlord, music arranger, composer, business owner, and oil man. Though his formal education ended in 1984, his real education began about that time, with interests ranging from classical literature, money and banking (yes, conspiracy theories, etc.), Bible study, children's books, to, of course, physics. His introduction to [[Creation Science]] in the late 1980s transformed my worldview from one of openness to any and all ideas, religious or otherwise, to one convinced of the existence of absolutes.

			==Science Career==
	My decision not to pursue physics as a career was based in part on the uneasiness I felt regarding the fundamental laws. My gut told me that in coming closer to the core of things, greater and greater elegance, not messiness, ought to prevail. God's laws ought to be based on a few unifying concepts, not on ad hoc formulas. But the reverse seemed to be the case. I was deeply troubled by the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty, and felt something must be amiss. Nonetheless for years on my own time I dabbled with some of my own ideas about the foundations of creation.		My decision not to pursue physics as a career was based in part on the uneasiness I felt regarding the fundamental laws. My gut told me that in coming closer to the core of things, greater and greater elegance, not messiness, ought to prevail. God's laws ought to be based on a few unifying concepts, not on ad hoc formulas. But the reverse seemed to be the case. I was deeply troubled by the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty, and felt something must be amiss. Nonetheless for years on my own time I dabbled with some of my own ideas about the foundations of creation.

	In the summer of 2007~~ ~~[~~../../php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=764~~ Russ McGlenn] directed me to the work of [~~../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=237~~ David L. Bergman]~~ ~~and ~~[../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=142~~ Dr. Charles William Lucas ~~Jr.~~]~~ ~~of [~~http://www.commonsensescience.org/~~ Common Sense Science].~~ ~~ This~~ Godsend reawakened my~~ passion for physics at a time in my life when I was~~ ~~could devote~~ ~~some attention~~ ~~to serious study. Since then I have read everything I could find relating to Bergman's ring model and the classical foundations of physics (~~[../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=52~~ Prof. Andre K. T. Assis], ~~[../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=429~~ Dr. Petr Beckmann], ~~[../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=117~~ Dr. Peter Granea],~~ [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=170~~ Dr. Thomas E. Phipps Jr.], ~~[../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=55~~ Dr. Paul Wesley],~~ [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=436~~ Dr. Parry H. Moon~~] & [index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=46~~ Dr. Domina Eberle Spencer], etc.), as well as the original works of the masters (Newton, Huygens, Faraday, Boltzmann, Mach, Planck, and of course Einstein).~~  I am convinced that~~ the [~~http://www.commonsensescience.org/~~ Common Sense Science] approach holds the key to solving many fundamental mysteries in physics, but one piece missing from the puzzle is the connection of entropy with electrodynamics, on which ~~I am~~ currently working.		In the summer of 2007 [[Russ McGlenn]] directed me to the work of [[David Bergman]] and Dr. [[Charles William Lucas]] of [[Common Sense Science]]. This awakened Greg's passion for physics at a time in my life when I was could devote some attention to serious study. Since then I have read everything I could find relating to Bergman's ring model and the classical foundations of physics (Prof. [[Andre K. T. Assis]], Dr. [[Petr Beckmann]], Dr. [[Peter Granea]], Dr. [[Thomas E Phipps]] Jr.], Dr. [[Paul Wesley]], Dr. Parry H. Moon, Dr. [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], etc.), as well as the original works of the masters (Newton, Huygens, Faraday, Boltzmann, Mach, Planck, and of course [[Albert Einstein]]). Greg firmly supports the [[Common Sense Science]] approach holds the key to solving many fundamental mysteries in physics, but one piece missing from the puzzle is the connection of entropy with electrodynamics, on which he is currently working.

			In 2013, Greg became president of the [[NPA]] and is currently the vice-president of the [[CNPS]].

			==Personal Life==

			Greg currently lives in Minnesota and is married and has three children and one grandchild.

	==Abstracts==		==Abstracts==

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T19:44:18Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 30 December 2016
Line 51:		Line 51:
	* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_105_dimdim.flv 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics, Part 2] (Video Lecture)		* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_105_dimdim.flv 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics, Part 2] (Video Lecture)

	[[Category:Scientist]]		[[Category:Scientist\|Volk Gregory]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:11:45Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox scientist
| name = Greg Volk
| image = Greg Volk 248.jpg
| alt = Greg Volk
| birth_date = {{birth date|1961|01|07|mf=y}}
| fields = [[Electrical Engineer]], [[Investments]]
| residence = Eagan, MN, United States
| nationality = USA
| known_for = [[Entropy]], [[Radiation]], [[Entanglement]], [[Unification]], [[Atomic Structure]], [[Toroidal Ring]], [[IAAD]], [[Mach's Principle]], [[Topology]], [[Hertzian Electrodynamics]]
}}

I attended Stanford from 1979 to 1984 as an electrical engineer and also took the entire core undergraduate curriculum in physics. I did not complete my masters in signal processing, but did work in optical character recognition (OCR) and CAD conversion. An entrepreneur at heart, I chose not to go into physics or engineering as a career, but have been a stock broker and investor, real estate broker, mortgage broker, landlord, music arranger, composer, business owner, and oil man. Though my formal education ended in 1984, my real education began about that time, with interests ranging from classical literature, money and banking (yes, conspiracy theories, etc.), Bible study, children's books, to, of course, physics. My introduction to Creation Science in the late 1980s transformed my worldview from one of openness to any and all ideas, religious or otherwise, to one convinced of the existence of absolutes.

My decision not to pursue physics as a career was based in part on the uneasiness I felt regarding the fundamental laws. My gut told me that in coming closer to the core of things, greater and greater elegance, not messiness, ought to prevail. God's laws ought to be based on a few unifying concepts, not on ad hoc formulas. But the reverse seemed to be the case. I was deeply troubled by the implications of Heisenberg's Uncertainty, and felt something must be amiss. Nonetheless for years on my own time I dabbled with some of my own ideas about the foundations of creation.

In the summer of 2007 [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=764 Russ McGlenn] directed me to the work of [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=237 David L. Bergman] and [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=142 Dr. Charles William Lucas Jr.] of [http://www.commonsensescience.org/ Common Sense Science].  This Godsend reawakened my passion for physics at a time in my life when I was could devote some attention to serious study. Since then I have read everything I could find relating to Bergman's ring model and the classical foundations of physics ([../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=52 Prof. Andre K. T. Assis], [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=429 Dr. Petr Beckmann], [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=117 Dr. Peter Granea], [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=170 Dr. Thomas E. Phipps Jr.], [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=55 Dr. Paul Wesley], [../../php2/index.php?tab0=Edit&tab1=Members&tab2=Display&id=436 Dr. Parry H. Moon] & [index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=46 Dr. Domina Eberle Spencer], etc.), as well as the original works of the masters (Newton, Huygens, Faraday, Boltzmann, Mach, Planck, and of course Einstein).  I am convinced that the [http://www.commonsensescience.org/ Common Sense Science] approach holds the key to solving many fundamental mysteries in physics, but one piece missing from the puzzle is the connection of entropy with electrodynamics, on which I am currently working.

==Abstracts==

* 2013 - "[[An Optimistic Assessment of "Fringe"? Science]]"
* 2012 - "[[Analysis of Lockyer Cubes]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6435.pdf Read in full])
* 2012 - "[[Fourier Closed Loops]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6701.pdf Read in full])
* 2011 - "[[The Convergence of New Physics Paradigms: Unity in Diversity]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6203.pdf Read in full])
* 2011 - "[[A Matter of Definition]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6095.pdf Read in full])
* 2010 - "[[Pseudovectors and Pseudoscalars, or Reflections on Reflection]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5261.pdf Read in full])
* 2010 - "[[The Rodin Number Map and Rodin Coil]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5352.pdf Read in full])
* 2010 - "[[Toroids, Vortices, Knots, Topology and Quanta]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5233.pdf Read in full])
* 2009 - "[[The Meaning of Maxwell's Equations]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2071.doc Read in full])
* 2009 - "[[The Nature of Eynptor (Entropy)]]"
* 2009 - "[[39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1635.pdf Read in full])
* 2009 - "[[Reference-Frame Independent Dynamics, Or How to Get Off Einstein's Train]]" ([http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2070.pdf Read in full])

==Books==

* 2012 - "[[Proceedings of the NPA, Volume 9]]" ([http://www.lulu.com/shop/greg-volk/19th-natural-philosophy-alliance-proceedings/paperback/product-20265413.html Read in full])
* 2011 - "[[Proceedings of the NPA, Volume 8]]" ([http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/npa-18-proceedings/16526280?productTrackingContext=search_results/search_shelf/center/2 Read in full])

==Media==

* 2012 - [http://youtu.be/ErqF-vmLkE0 ] (Video Lecture)
* 2012 - [http://youtu.be/N2yriNiPDOo ] (Video Lecture)
* 2011 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_368_dimdim.flv A Matter of Definition] (Video Lecture)
* 2010 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_355_dimdim.flv The Meaning of Maxwell's Equations, Part 2: Ampere's Law] (Video Lecture)
* 2010 - [http://intalek.com/AV/VNN/VortexNetworkNewsHour/06-19-2010-VNN.mp3 17th NPA Conference in Long Beach - June 23 - 26] (Audio Radio)
* 2010 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_312_dimdim.flv The Meaning of Maxwell's Equations, Part 1: Gauss D Law] (Video Lecture)
* 2010 - [http://intalek.com/AV/VNN/ProgressiveTechnologyHour/04-24-2010-Technology.mp3 Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference 2010] (Audio Radio)
* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_257_dimdim.flv Reference Frame Independent Dynamics, Or How to Get Off Einstein's Train, Part 2] (Video Demonstration)
* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_273_dimdim.flv Interferometry Group] (Video Group Meeting)
* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_183_dimdim.flv Reference-Frame Independent Dynamics, Or How to Get Off Einstein's Train, Part 1] (Video Lecture)
* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_138_dimdim.flv 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics, Part 4] (Video Lecture)
* 2009 - [http://www.worldsci.org/videos/dimdim/event_105_dimdim.flv 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics, Part 2] (Video Lecture)

[[Category:Scientist]]