Experimental Disproof of Special Relativity - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:31:56Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|experimental disproof special relativity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|experimental disproof special relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|experimental disproof special relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:23:41Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	According to Einstein, Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is valid for inertial reference frames in constant relative translation. But such a condition is never fulfilled in nature, where curved paths and accelerations are everywhere present. This situation implies questions that are devastating for SRT; any answer at all is fatal to SRT and to the Lorentz transformations (LT?s) it implies. Furthermore, comparative analysis of classical optical experiments and other ?relativistic? phenomena reveals arbitrariness and confusion about the experimental validation of SRT. Actually, what has been experimentally established is an unclear amalgam of SRT and general relativity theory (GRT). The foundations of both theories are thus brought into question.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		According to Einstein, Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is valid for inertial reference frames in constant relative translation. But such a condition is never fulfilled in nature, where curved paths and accelerations are everywhere present. This situation implies questions that are devastating for SRT; any answer at all is fatal to SRT and to the Lorentz transformations (LT?s) it implies. Furthermore, comparative analysis of classical optical experiments and other ?relativistic? phenomena reveals arbitrariness and confusion about the experimental validation of SRT. Actually, what has been experimentally established is an unclear amalgam of SRT and general relativity theory (GRT). The foundations of both theories are thus brought into question.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|experimental disproof special relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:29:47Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Experimental Disproof of Special Relativity
| author = [[Antonis Agathangelidis]]
| published = 1998
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[9]]
| number = [[2]]
| pages = 23-26
}}

==Abstract==

According to Einstein, Special Relativity Theory (SRT) is valid for inertial reference frames in constant relative translation. But such a condition is never fulfilled in nature, where curved paths and accelerations are everywhere present. This situation implies questions that are devastating for SRT; any answer at all is fatal to SRT and to the Lorentz transformations (LT?s) it implies. Furthermore, comparative analysis of classical optical experiments and other ?relativistic? phenomena reveals arbitrariness and confusion about the experimental validation of SRT. Actually, what has been experimentally established is an unclear amalgam of SRT and general relativity theory (GRT). The foundations of both theories are thus brought into question.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]