Expansion Tectonics: An Overview - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:31:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|expansion tectonics overview]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|expansion tectonics overview]]

	[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]		[[Category:Expansion Tectonics\|expansion tectonics overview]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:23:28Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	One of the most profound statements the late Professor Sam Warren Carey (Emeritus Professor of Geology from the University of Tasmania) said to me when I first started researching Expansion Tectonics was: If 50 million believe in a fallacy it is still a fallacy. The point he was making was that the validity of any theory does not depend upon the number of people believing it; hence, an accepted theory may still be fundamentally wrong regardless of how many people believe it is correct. The Plate Tectonic interpretation of global data, for instance, is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has remained constant, or near constant, throughout history. As will be outlined in this paper, this contrasts with an Expansion Tectonic interpretation of the same global data which is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has been steadily increasing throughout Earth history.		One of the most profound statements the late Professor Sam Warren Carey (Emeritus Professor of Geology from the University of Tasmania) said to me when I first started researching Expansion Tectonics was: If 50 million believe in a fallacy it is still a fallacy. The point he was making was that the validity of any theory does not depend upon the number of people believing it; hence, an accepted theory may still be fundamentally wrong regardless of how many people believe it is correct. The Plate Tectonic interpretation of global data, for instance, is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has remained constant, or near constant, throughout history. As will be outlined in this paper, this contrasts with an Expansion Tectonic interpretation of the same global data which is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has been steadily increasing throughout Earth history.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|expansion tectonics overview]]

	[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]		[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-29T05:51:41Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Expansion Tectonics: An Overview
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1177.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[James Maxlow]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 18
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1177.pdf here]

==Abstract==

One of the most profound statements the late Professor Sam Warren Carey (Emeritus Professor of Geology from the University of Tasmania) said to me when I first started researching Expansion Tectonics was: If 50 million believe in a fallacy it is still a fallacy. The point he was making was that the validity of any theory does not depend upon the number of people believing it; hence, an accepted theory may still be fundamentally wrong regardless of how many people believe it is correct. The Plate Tectonic interpretation of global data, for instance, is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has remained constant, or near constant, throughout history. As will be outlined in this paper, this contrasts with an Expansion Tectonic interpretation of the same global data which is based on the fundamental premise that the Earths radius has been steadily increasing throughout Earth history.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]