Electric Scarring of the Earth's Surface - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:29:34Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electric scarring earth 's surface]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electric scarring earth 's surface]]

	[[Category:Structure]]		[[Category:Structure\|electric scarring earth 's surface]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:19:38Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	This paper explores the hypothesis that most canyons and riverbeds were initially formed by electrical events and not by fluvial erosion. The macroscale appearance of river beds, mountain ranges, and other geological features exhibit characteristics which are typical of electric scarring on a dielectric medium. An attempt was made to systematically quantify the differences in geologic structures by fractal dimensions measurements using the Box counting method. High altitude images of selected geological formations were analyzed. The geological features exhibited self-affinity, a characteristic of electrical discharges, but not a characteristic of unconfined fluvial systems. When the images were skeletonized, it was found that the fractal dimensions of the geologic structures (N = 15) were not dissimilar to the fractal dimensions of electric discharges on dielectric media (N = 9, p = 0.902, Tukey-Kramer HSD); in contrast the same geologic structures were dissimilar from known geological structures arising from fluvial events (N = 7, p < 0.0001), and the fluvial events were also dissimilar from electrical discharges (p < 0.0001). Supplementary Monte Carlo simulations augmented these findings. Other methodologies were explored in attempts to quantify the energies involved in such events. The electrical discharge energy required for rock removal to create the Grand Canyon was calculated using known explosive equivalencies. The energy was found to be equivalent to about 4-5 times the current level of solar output (~2 x 10<sup>13</sup> watts), consistent with past literature on the subject. Other implications to the field of geology will be discussed as well.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		This paper explores the hypothesis that most canyons and riverbeds were initially formed by electrical events and not by fluvial erosion. The macroscale appearance of river beds, mountain ranges, and other geological features exhibit characteristics which are typical of electric scarring on a dielectric medium. An attempt was made to systematically quantify the differences in geologic structures by fractal dimensions measurements using the Box counting method. High altitude images of selected geological formations were analyzed. The geological features exhibited self-affinity, a characteristic of electrical discharges, but not a characteristic of unconfined fluvial systems. When the images were skeletonized, it was found that the fractal dimensions of the geologic structures (N = 15) were not dissimilar to the fractal dimensions of electric discharges on dielectric media (N = 9, p = 0.902, Tukey-Kramer HSD); in contrast the same geologic structures were dissimilar from known geological structures arising from fluvial events (N = 7, p < 0.0001), and the fluvial events were also dissimilar from electrical discharges (p < 0.0001). Supplementary Monte Carlo simulations augmented these findings. Other methodologies were explored in attempts to quantify the energies involved in such events. The electrical discharge energy required for rock removal to create the Grand Canyon was calculated using known explosive equivalencies. The energy was found to be equivalent to about 4-5 times the current level of solar output (~2 x 10<sup>13</sup> watts), consistent with past literature on the subject. Other implications to the field of geology will be discussed as well.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|electric scarring earth 's surface]]

	[[Category:Structure]]		[[Category:Structure]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T18:45:22Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Electric Scarring of the Earth\'s Surface
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6482.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Paul E Anderson]]
| published = 2012
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[9]]
| num_pages = 8
| pages = 4-11
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6482.pdf here]

==Abstract==

This paper explores the hypothesis that most canyons and riverbeds were initially formed by electrical events and not by fluvial erosion. The macroscale appearance of river beds, mountain ranges, and other geological features exhibit characteristics which are typical of electric scarring on a dielectric medium. An attempt was made to systematically quantify the differences in geologic structures by fractal dimensions measurements using the Box counting method. High altitude images of selected geological formations were analyzed. The geological features exhibited self-affinity, a characteristic of electrical discharges, but not a characteristic of unconfined fluvial systems. When the images were skeletonized, it was found that the fractal dimensions of the geologic structures (N = 15) were not dissimilar to the fractal dimensions of electric discharges on dielectric media (N = 9, p = 0.902, Tukey-Kramer HSD); in contrast the same geologic structures were dissimilar from known geological structures arising from fluvial events (N = 7, p < 0.0001), and the fluvial events were also dissimilar from electrical discharges (p < 0.0001). Supplementary Monte Carlo simulations augmented these findings. Other methodologies were explored in attempts to quantify the energies involved in such events. The electrical discharge energy required for rock removal to create the Grand Canyon was calculated using known explosive equivalencies. The energy was found to be equivalent to about 4-5 times the current level of solar output (~2 x 10<sup>13</sup> watts), consistent with past literature on the subject. Other implications to the field of geology will be discussed as well.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Structure]]