Einstein's Time Dilation Experimentally Refuted - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:29:12Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's time dilation experimentally refuted]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's time dilation experimentally refuted]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|einstein 's time dilation experimentally refuted]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:19:01Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 1 January 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Did you know that two scientists at CERN (Switzerland) disproved Einsteins time-dilation through an ingenious experiment, as early as 1996? ''Antoine Suarez'' and ''Valerio Scarani'' shot a laser beam into a crystal made of potassium, niobium and oxygene, thereby producing two 'entangled' beams or photons. One of them was sent to the city of Bernex, the other to the city of Bellevue, about 10 kilometers apart. The detector in Bellevue was rotated very fast, so that its velocity (at the periphery) neared that of light. Therefore, a time dilation should ensue, and one of the photons should arrive earlier than the other. This could be measured through a phase-shift between the two beams. No such phase-shift was be observed. Conclusion: <b>There is no time dilation</b>. We may go one step further and say: <b>There is no special relativity</b>.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Did you know that two scientists at CERN (Switzerland) disproved Einsteins time-dilation through an ingenious experiment, as early as 1996? ''Antoine Suarez'' and ''Valerio Scarani'' shot a laser beam into a crystal made of potassium, niobium and oxygene, thereby producing two 'entangled' beams or photons. One of them was sent to the city of Bernex, the other to the city of Bellevue, about 10 kilometers apart. The detector in Bellevue was rotated very fast, so that its velocity (at the periphery) neared that of light. Therefore, a time dilation should ensue, and one of the photons should arrive earlier than the other. This could be measured through a phase-shift between the two beams. No such phase-shift was be observed. Conclusion: <b>There is no time dilation</b>. We may go one step further and say: <b>There is no special relativity</b>.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's time dilation experimentally refuted]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:57:22Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Einstein\'s Time Dilation Experimentally Refuted
| author = [[Peter Ripota]]
| keywords = [[relativity]], [[time dilation]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[None]]
}}

==Abstract==

Did you know that two scientists at CERN (Switzerland) disproved Einsteins time-dilation through an ingenious experiment, as early as 1996? ''Antoine Suarez'' and ''Valerio Scarani'' shot a laser beam into a crystal made of potassium, niobium and oxygene, thereby producing two 'entangled' beams or photons. One of them was sent to the city of Bernex, the other to the city of Bellevue, about 10 kilometers apart. The detector in Bellevue was rotated very fast, so that its velocity (at the periphery) neared that of light. Therefore, a time dilation should ensue, and one of the photons should arrive earlier than the other. This could be measured through a phase-shift between the two beams. No such phase-shift was be observed. Conclusion: <b>There is no time dilation</b>. We may go one step further and say: <b>There is no special relativity</b>.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]