Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:11:14Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consistency test alternative kinematics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T04:58:46Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Consistency Test of an Alternative Kinematics
| author = [[Thomas E Phipps]]
| keywords = [[Kinematics]]
| published = 1989
| journal = [[Physics Essays]]
| volume = [[2]]
| number = [[4]]
| pages = 380-384
}}

==Abstract==

A proposed alternative to Einstein's kinematics, based on the postulated invariance 1) of particle proper time and 2) of object length (i.e., nonoccurrence of the Lorentz contraction), is tested for its ability to exhibit consistency between the aging rates of an accelerated 'light clock' and its comoving observer. The problem is nontrivial because the altered kinematics requires employment of an altered electromagnetism, the so-called 'neo-Hertzian' generalization of Maxwell's theory, which is invariant under inertial transformations. Difficulties of crucial experimentation are touched upon.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

Consistency Test of an Alternative Kinematics - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

Maintenance script: Imported from text file