Combined Gravitational Action - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:23:50Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|combined gravitational action]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|combined gravitational action]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|combined gravitational action]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:09:33Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Why do Newton?s theory of gravitation and Einstein?s general relativity not manage to explain the ap-parent anomalous deceleration of certain spacecrafts, such as Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Ulysses, Galileo, and the anomalous apsidal motion of the binary stars DI Herculis? According to the present work (Combined Gravitational Action/Combgravaction), the problem raised by this question is mainly caused by the fact that the classical and relativistic theories of gravitation are founded on the same approximate expression of the Newton?s universal law of gravitation which, in reality, is not a single force in the common classical sense, but a resultant of two forces that make between them a very small angle , especially, when the test-mass is in motion outside the gravitational source. The smallness of that angle means that the resultant force and its two components are almost in superposition.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Why do Newton?s theory of gravitation and Einstein?s general relativity not manage to explain the ap-parent anomalous deceleration of certain spacecrafts, such as Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Ulysses, Galileo, and the anomalous apsidal motion of the binary stars DI Herculis? According to the present work (Combined Gravitational Action/Combgravaction), the problem raised by this question is mainly caused by the fact that the classical and relativistic theories of gravitation are founded on the same approximate expression of the Newton?s universal law of gravitation which, in reality, is not a single force in the common classical sense, but a resultant of two forces that make between them a very small angle , especially, when the test-mass is in motion outside the gravitational source. The smallness of that angle means that the resultant force and its two components are almost in superposition.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|combined gravitational action]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:46:07Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Combined Gravitational Action
| author = [[Mohamed Elmansour Hassani]]
| keywords = [[Pioneer 10/11]], [[combined gravitational action]], [[combined gravitational potential energy]], [[angle of combined gravitational action]], [[Newton?s universal law of gravitation]], [[local expansion of the Universe]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[20]]
| number = [[S3]]
| pages = 54-60
}}

==Abstract==

Why do Newton?s theory of gravitation and Einstein?s general relativity not manage to explain the ap-parent anomalous deceleration of certain spacecrafts, such as Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Ulysses, Galileo, and the anomalous apsidal motion of the binary stars DI Herculis? According to the present work (Combined Gravitational Action/Combgravaction), the problem raised by this question is mainly caused by the fact that the classical and relativistic theories of gravitation are founded on the same approximate expression of the Newton?s universal law of gravitation which, in reality, is not a single force in the common classical sense, but a resultant of two forces that make between them a very small angle , especially, when the test-mass is in motion outside the gravitational source. The smallness of that angle means that the resultant force and its two components are almost in superposition.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]