Classical and Special Theory of Relativty - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:23:24Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|classical special theory relativty]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|classical special theory relativty]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|classical special theory relativty]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:08:42Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The beginning of XXI century ? progress of freedom of scientific thinking. Already students understand a full inconsistency STR. There is no force which could enslave their creative potential. Absurd academic doctrines STR, the captivated school and high school textbooks, are doomed. The new generation of scientists will reject them. The classical theory of a relativity has appeared for a long time. In the greatest contribu-tion to its creation have brought Galileo and Newton. It successfully solves the primary goals connected to activity of the person. However, in the beginning of XX century theoretical results which limited a scope of laws of the classical theory of a relativity to speeds considerably smaller speeds of light of 300000 km/s have been received. This fundamental consequence fol-lows from Lorentz's transformations which appeared in the base of the Special theory of a rela-tivity (STR), developed by A. Einstein. Experimental data which ostensibly confirm reliability STR were found also. However these data had no unequivocal interpretation of their reliability, therefore STR has been subjected to criticism from the moment of its birth. Now this criticism has reached apogee and proofs of an inaccuracy STR have appeared. In what their essence?[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The beginning of XXI century ? progress of freedom of scientific thinking. Already students understand a full inconsistency STR. There is no force which could enslave their creative potential. Absurd academic doctrines STR, the captivated school and high school textbooks, are doomed. The new generation of scientists will reject them. The classical theory of a relativity has appeared for a long time. In the greatest contribu-tion to its creation have brought Galileo and Newton. It successfully solves the primary goals connected to activity of the person. However, in the beginning of XX century theoretical results which limited a scope of laws of the classical theory of a relativity to speeds considerably smaller speeds of light of 300000 km/s have been received. This fundamental consequence fol-lows from Lorentz's transformations which appeared in the base of the Special theory of a rela-tivity (STR), developed by A. Einstein. Experimental data which ostensibly confirm reliability STR were found also. However these data had no unequivocal interpretation of their reliability, therefore STR has been subjected to criticism from the moment of its birth. Now this criticism has reached apogee and proofs of an inaccuracy STR have appeared. In what their essence?

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|classical special theory relativty]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:09:03Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Classical and Special Theory of Relativty
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_116.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Philipp M Kanarev]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 3
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_116.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The beginning of XXI century ? progress of freedom of scientific thinking. Already students understand a full inconsistency STR. There is no force which could enslave their creative potential. Absurd academic doctrines STR, the captivated school and high school textbooks, are doomed. The new generation of scientists will reject them. The classical theory of a relativity has appeared for a long time. In the greatest contribu-tion to its creation have brought Galileo and Newton. It successfully solves the primary goals connected to activity of the person. However, in the beginning of XX century theoretical results which limited a scope of laws of the classical theory of a relativity to speeds considerably smaller speeds of light of 300000 km/s have been received. This fundamental consequence fol-lows from Lorentz's transformations which appeared in the base of the Special theory of a rela-tivity (STR), developed by A. Einstein. Experimental data which ostensibly confirm reliability STR were found also. However these data had no unequivocal interpretation of their reliability, therefore STR has been subjected to criticism from the moment of its birth. Now this criticism has reached apogee and proofs of an inaccuracy STR have appeared. In what their essence?[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]