Assessing Consequences of Overextended Secret Reviewing - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:03:30Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	We learn too much and understand too little,<br />Yet understanding comes from learning<br />So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on.		We learn too much and understand too little,<br />Yet understanding comes from learning<br />So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|assessing consequences overextended secret reviewing]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T04:58:02Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Assessing Consequences of Overextended Secret Reviewing
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5293.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Evert Jan Post]]
| published = 2010
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[7]]
| num_pages = 2
| pages = 382-383
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5293.pdf here]

==Abstract==

We learn too much and understand too little,<br />Yet understanding comes from learning<br />So strive using the latter to enhance the first What motivates the majority of scientists to accept the Copenhagen doctrine of quantum mechanics, when superior alternatives have existed since de Rham and before? This paper assesses what's really going on.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]