Another Aftershock for the Big Bang - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:18:30Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 1 January 2017
Line 22:		Line 22:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|another aftershock big bang]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|another aftershock big bang]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy\|another aftershock big bang]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|another aftershock big bang]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:00:34Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Galaxies are extended objects, the closest of which are clearly resolvable into individual stars. Quasars, by contrast, are generally point-like objects, sometimes visible only to radio telescopes, whose true nature is still debated.		Galaxies are extended objects, the closest of which are clearly resolvable into individual stars. Quasars, by contrast, are generally point-like objects, sometimes visible only to radio telescopes, whose true nature is still debated.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|another aftershock big bang]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:18:34Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Another Aftershock for the Big Bang
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_600.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Tom Van Flandern]]
| keywords = [[cosmological redshift]], [[big bang model]], [[energy loss mechanism]]
| published = 1996
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[3]]
| number = [[1]]
| num_pages = 2
| pages = 17-18
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_600.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Last year in this journal I reported evidence that the cosmological redshift of galaxy light may not indicate that the universe is expanding at all. Results from several cosmological tests favor instead an energy loss mechanism in a basically static universe. (Apeiron, January 1995, pp. 20- 24.) The past year?s research and discoveries have given mainstream cosmologists little consolation for shoring up the crumbling edifice of the standard big bang model. Much of the latest news concerns quasars. Here are the highlights of two of the most significant new findings reported in the series ?Remarkable Papers in the Journals? in the Meta Research Bulletin, for which I serve as editor.

Galaxies are extended objects, the closest of which are clearly resolvable into individual stars. Quasars, by contrast, are generally point-like objects, sometimes visible only to radio telescopes, whose true nature is still debated.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:New Energy]]
[[Category:Cosmology]]