An Evolutionary Earth Expansion Hypothesis - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:17:19Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|evolutionary earth expansion hypothesis]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|evolutionary earth expansion hypothesis]]

	[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]		[[Category:Expansion Tectonics\|evolutionary earth expansion hypothesis]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:58:18Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Furthermore, I've been impressed since my student years, by the dogmatic and simplistic approach of plate tectonics advocates. I rejected, on philosophical grounds, the perfect equilibrium between input and output of crust. I could not understand how easily the energy deficit of convection cells, of plate movements and of subduction was overlooked.		Furthermore, I've been impressed since my student years, by the dogmatic and simplistic approach of plate tectonics advocates. I rejected, on philosophical grounds, the perfect equilibrium between input and output of crust. I could not understand how easily the energy deficit of convection cells, of plate movements and of subduction was overlooked.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|evolutionary earth expansion hypothesis]]

	[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]		[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T04:57:50Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = An Evolutionary Earth Expansion Hypothesis
| author = [[Stavros T Tassos]]
| keywords = [[evolutionary]], [[Earth]], [[expansion hypothesis]], [[finite or infinite]], [[philosophical]], [[seismology]]
| published = 1994
| journal = [[None]]
| pages = 275-280
}}

==Abstract==

Although I am a research scientist in geophysics - seismology, I feel that an attempt to answer fundamental philosophical questions, like: Is the universe finite or infinite? Is Is it static or dynamic? Is it an open or closed system? and so on, will provide some intuitive insights into the incomplete and scarce set of data that scientists have to work with.

Furthermore, I've been impressed since my student years, by the dogmatic and simplistic approach of plate tectonics advocates. I rejected, on philosophical grounds, the perfect equilibrium between input and output of crust. I could not understand how easily the energy deficit of convection cells, of plate movements and of subduction was overlooked.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Expansion Tectonics]]