An Analysis of Energy and Charge - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:16:51Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 1 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|analysis energy charge]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|analysis energy charge]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy\|analysis energy charge]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:57:40Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	It is interesting to compare energy and charge, for the two are sometimes confused. To illustrate this confusion, in quantum mechanics the electron is considered to be a point charge, though this writer does not agree. However, this simple assumption has not only confused those who accept quantum mechanics, but it has also confused others who neglect to recognize that this mistake is part of what is today perceived as science. So it infects even those who find the assumptions and non-objective analysis of quantum mechanics unacceptable.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		It is interesting to compare energy and charge, for the two are sometimes confused. To illustrate this confusion, in quantum mechanics the electron is considered to be a point charge, though this writer does not agree. However, this simple assumption has not only confused those who accept quantum mechanics, but it has also confused others who neglect to recognize that this mistake is part of what is today perceived as science. So it infects even those who find the assumptions and non-objective analysis of quantum mechanics unacceptable.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|analysis energy charge]]

	[[Category:New Energy]]		[[Category:New Energy]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:28:15Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = An Analysis of Energy and Charge
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_433.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Arnold G Gulko]]
| keywords = [[Energy]], [[Charge]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 5
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_433.pdf here]

==Abstract==

It is interesting to compare energy and charge, for the two are sometimes confused. To illustrate this confusion, in quantum mechanics the electron is considered to be a point charge, though this writer does not agree. However, this simple assumption has not only confused those who accept quantum mechanics, but it has also confused others who neglect to recognize that this mistake is part of what is today perceived as science. So it infects even those who find the assumptions and non-objective analysis of quantum mechanics unacceptable.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:New Energy]]