39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics - Revision history

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:13:25Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questionable assumptions modern physics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questionable assumptions modern physics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|questionable assumptions modern physics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:52:18Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The growing body of anomalies in new energy, low energy nuclear reactions, astrophysics, atomic physics, and entanglement, combined with the failure of the Standard Model and string theory to predict many of the most basic fundamental phenomena, all point to a need for major new paradigms. Not Band-Aids, but revolutionary new ways of conceptualizing physics, in the spirit of Thomas Kuhn's <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em>. This paper identifies a number of long-held, but unproven assumptions currently being challenged by an increasing number of alternative scientists. Two common themes, both with venerable histories, keep recurring in the many alternative theories being proposed: (1) Mach's Principle, and (2) toroidal, vortex particles. Matter-based Mach's Principle differs from both space-based universal frames and observer-based Einsteinian relativity. Toroidal particles, in addition to explaining electron spin and the fundamental constants, satisfy the basic requirement of Gauss's misunderstood B Law, that motion itself circulates. Though a comprehensive theory is beyond the scope of this paper, it will suggest alternatives to the long list of assumptions in context.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The growing body of anomalies in new energy, low energy nuclear reactions, astrophysics, atomic physics, and entanglement, combined with the failure of the Standard Model and string theory to predict many of the most basic fundamental phenomena, all point to a need for major new paradigms. Not Band-Aids, but revolutionary new ways of conceptualizing physics, in the spirit of Thomas Kuhn's <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em>. This paper identifies a number of long-held, but unproven assumptions currently being challenged by an increasing number of alternative scientists. Two common themes, both with venerable histories, keep recurring in the many alternative theories being proposed: (1) Mach's Principle, and (2) toroidal, vortex particles. Matter-based Mach's Principle differs from both space-based universal frames and observer-based Einsteinian relativity. Toroidal particles, in addition to explaining electron spin and the fundamental constants, satisfy the basic requirement of Gauss's misunderstood B Law, that motion itself circulates. Though a comprehensive theory is beyond the scope of this paper, it will suggest alternatives to the long list of assumptions in context.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|questionable assumptions modern physics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:07:24Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1635.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Greg Volk]]
| keywords = [[Paradigms]], [[Assumptions]], [[Relativity]], [[Reference Frame]], [[Mach?s Principle]], [[Vortex]], [[Toroidal Ring]], [[Elementary Particles]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 16
| pages = 235-242
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1635.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The growing body of anomalies in new energy, low energy nuclear reactions, astrophysics, atomic physics, and entanglement, combined with the failure of the Standard Model and string theory to predict many of the most basic fundamental phenomena, all point to a need for major new paradigms. Not Band-Aids, but revolutionary new ways of conceptualizing physics, in the spirit of Thomas Kuhn's <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em>. This paper identifies a number of long-held, but unproven assumptions currently being challenged by an increasing number of alternative scientists. Two common themes, both with venerable histories, keep recurring in the many alternative theories being proposed: (1) Mach's Principle, and (2) toroidal, vortex particles. Matter-based Mach's Principle differs from both space-based universal frames and observer-based Einsteinian relativity. Toroidal particles, in addition to explaining electron spin and the fundamental constants, satisfy the basic requirement of Gauss's misunderstood B Law, that motion itself circulates. Though a comprehensive theory is beyond the scope of this paper, it will suggest alternatives to the long list of assumptions in context.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]